RESUMEN
Outpatient treatment options for mild to moderate COVID-19 are severely limited. While many therapeutic options have been proposed, very few have demonstrated the appropriate safety and efficacy to warrant approval by national or international regulatory bodies. Monoclonal antibodies have been shown to decrease hospitalization in high-risk patients, but use remains limited due to challenges associated with both production and administration, and other treatment options are urgently needed. The anti-inflammatory drug fluticasone propionate has recently emerged as a potential outpatient treatment option, especially for those with newly diagnosed disease. This manuscript reviews what is known about fluticasone and looks ahead to examine how the drug may be used in the future to address the COVID-19 pandemic.
Asunto(s)
Antiasmáticos , Asma , Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , Administración por Inhalación , Androstadienos/efectos adversos , Antiasmáticos/efectos adversos , Asma/tratamiento farmacológico , Método Doble Ciego , Fluticasona/efectos adversos , Humanos , PandemiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are significant drug-drug interactions between human immunodeficiency virus antiretroviral therapy and intranasal steroids, leading to high serum concentrations of iatrogenic steroids and subsequently Cushing's syndrome. METHOD: All articles in the literature on cases of intranasal steroid and antiretroviral therapy interactions were reviewed. Full-length manuscripts were analysed and the relevant data were extracted. RESULTS: A literature search and further cross-referencing yielded a total of seven reports on drug-drug interactions of intranasal corticosteroids and human immunodeficiency virus protease inhibitors, published between 1999 and 2019. CONCLUSION: The use of potent steroids metabolised via CYP3A4, such as fluticasone and budesonide, are not recommended for patients taking ritonavir or cobicistat. Mometasone should be used cautiously with ritonavir because of pharmacokinetic similarities to fluticasone. There was a delayed onset of symptoms in many cases, most likely due to the relatively lower systemic bioavailability of intranasal fluticasone.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Cushing/inducido químicamente , Infecciones por VIH/tratamiento farmacológico , Inhibidores de la Proteasa del VIH/efectos adversos , VIH , Administración Intranasal , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Adulto , Cobicistat/administración & dosificación , Cobicistat/efectos adversos , Interacciones Farmacológicas , Fluticasona/administración & dosificación , Fluticasona/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Proteasa del VIH/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Ritonavir/administración & dosificación , Ritonavir/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: While it is presumed that immunosuppressed patients, such as solid organ transplant recipients on immunosuppression, are at greater risk from SARS-CoV-2 infection than the general population, the antibody response to infection in this patient population has not been studied. METHODS: In this report, we follow the anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels in patients with COVID-19 who are undergoing exogenous immunosuppression. Specifically, we studied the antibody response of 3 solid organ transplant recipient patients, 3 patients who take daily inhaled fluticasone, and a patient on etanercept and daily inhaled fluticasone, and compared them to 5 patients not on exogenous immunosuppression. RESULTS: We found that the solid organ transplant patients on full immunosuppression are at risk of having a delayed antibody response and poor outcome. We did not find evidence that inhaled steroids or etanercept predispose patients to delayed immune response to SARS-CoV-2. CONCLUSION: The data presented here suggest that solid organ transplant recipients may be good candidates for early targeted intervention against SARS-CoV-2.